Sasaki's REDD & Environmental Research

Conference in Phnom Penh (download files below)

International Conference on Managing Forest Resources for Multiple Ecosystem Services under Robust and Fragile Environments

Main Organizers

Risk Analysis Research Center (RARC), the Institute of Statistical Mathematics (ISM)
Graduate School of Applied Informatics (GSAI), University of Hyogo
FORMATH Research Group

Main Sponsors
Risk Analysis Research Center (RARC), the Institute of Statistical Mathematics (ISM)

Co-Organizers:

Forestry Administration (FA)
Ecosystem Adaptability Global COE, Tohoku University
Royal University of Phnom Penh (RUPP)

Scientific Committee
Dr. YOSHIMOTO Atsushi, RARC, ISM
Dr. SASAKI Nophea, GSAI, University of Hyogo
Dr. SOKH Heng, Institute for Forest and Wildlife Research and Development, FA
Mr. SEAK Sophat, Department of Environmental Science (DES), RUPP
Dr. KONOSHIMA Masashi, Tohoku University

Organizing Committee
Dr. SASAKI Nophea
Mr. SEAK Sophat
Dr. SOKH Heng
Mr. SAN Vibol, DES, RUPP
Mr. KHUN Vathana, FA

Background and Objective

Accounting for 20% of global carbon emissions, tropical deforestation and forest degradation also affect 89% of all threatened birds, 83% of mammals, and 91% of threatened plants. Realizing the prominent role of tropical forests in global climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable development, managing forest resources for multiple ecosystem services is widely recognized in the international climate change conventions, especially in the Copenhagen Accord reached in December 2009. Furthermore, the Convention on Biological Diversity also recognizes the important linkages between protecting biodiversity and full ecosystem services for reducing poverty in developing countries and mitigating climate change.

The conference brings together international and local academia, policy makers, representatives of forest communities, donors, NGOs, and companies to advance the management of forest ecosystems. The main objective of this conference is to discuss the timely important topics on avoiding deforestation and forest degradation, assessing forest ecosystem services and managing forest resources in the robust and fragile environments with national and international scholars, policy makers, and forestry practitioners. With total forest cover of about 59%, Cambodian government has committed itself to bringing remaining forests under sustainable use and management taking advantages of anticipated  climate change agreement on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) financial mechanism. This conference provides a good opportunity to share experiences with senior government officials and leading scholars in the aforementioned fields.

Keynote Speakers

H.E. TY Sokhun, Undersecretary of State, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
H.E. CHHENG Kimsun, Delegate of the Royal Government in charge as Chief of Forestry Administration
H.E. Prof. LAV Chhiv Eav, RUPP Rector
Mr. JEPSEN, Kahl Jacob, Counsellor, Royal Danish Embassy/DANIDA

PROGRAM (please click on the title to download presentation)

9 August 2010

Time Title Name Affiliation
8:00-8:30 Registration
Opening Session
8:30-8:40 Conference Introduction Dr. YOSHIMOTO Atsushi Professor, ISM
8:40-8:50 Welcome Speech H.E. Prof.

LAV Chhiv Eav

Rector, Royal University of Phnom Penh (RUPP)
8:50-9:00 Opening Speech H.E. TY Sokhun Undersecretary of State, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF)
9:00-9:10 Keynote Address JEPSEN, Kahl Jacob Counsellor, Royal Danish

Embassy/DANIDA

9:10-9:30 Coffee Break
Session 1 Status of Deforestation, Forest Degradation, and Forest Management H.E. TY Sokhun, Chairman Undersecretary of State, MAFF
9:30-9:50 Managing Forests in Cambodia for Multiple Benefits H.E. CHHENG Kimsun Delegate of the Royal Government in charge as Chief of Forestry Administration
9:50-10:05 Cambodia’s National Forest Programme: Innovative Forest Financing for Sustainable Forest Management Dr. SOKH Heng Acting Director, Institute for Forest and Wildlife Research and Development (IRD), FA
10:05-10:20 Climate Change, Forest Conversion and Illegal Logging, Driver for Change in the Cambodian Forest Sector EANG Savet Director of Mekong Inspectorate, FA
10:20-10:40 Multidimensional Assessment of three Types of Forest Management in Cambodia-Activity Report of GCOE program “Asian Conservation Ecology”, Kyushu University – Dr. KAJISA Tsuyoshi Assistant Professor

Kyushu University

10:40-11:00 Coffee Break
Session 2 Status of Forest Ecosystem Services Dr. SOKH Heng, Chairman Acting Director, Institute for Forest and Wildlife Research and Development (IRD), FA
11:00-11:20 Forest Watershed in Relation to Water Shortages in Cambodia GAUNTLETT Suwanna Chief Executive Officer, Wildlife Alliance
11:20-11:40 Lessons and Experiences in Strengthening the Contribution of NTFP Livelihoods in Sustainable Forest Management in Cambodia KHOU Eanghourt & PINTO Femy National NTFP Facilitator, Cambodia NTFP Working Group
11:40-12:00 Sustainable Pathways for Attaining the Millennium Development Goals: Ecosystem Services & Local Livelihoods — A Case Study in Cambodia NANG Phirun Research Associate, CDRI
12:00-13:30 Lunch break
Session 3 Managing Forests for Provisional Ecosystem Services Dr. KONOSHIMA Masashi, Chairman Associate Professor, Ryukyu University
13:30-13:50 Management of the Emerald Triangle Protected Forests Complex to Promote Cooperation for Trans-boundary Biodiversity Conservation between Thailand, Cambodia and Laos (Phase II), ITTO PD 289/04 Rev.1 (F) CHHEANG Dany, KAMOL Wisupaka Acting Chief of Wildlife Protection Office, FA
13:50-14:10 Payment of Environmental Services Development in Cambodia OUM Pisey PES Policy Advisor, Ministry of Environment (MoE)
14:10-14:30 Biodiversity Conservation as a Tool to Sustain Forest Ecosystem Services SEAK Sophat, Lecturer, Department of Environmental Science (DES), RUPP
14:30-15:00 Coffee Break
Session 4 Managing Forests for Regulating Ecosystem Services EVANS Tom Deputy Director, WCS
15:00-15:20 The Forestry Management Cultural Landscape and Environment  in Angkor Park Zone NIN Chansamean Director, Department of Forest Management, Cultural Landscape and Environment, APSARA Authority
15:20-15:40 Carbon Storage of Tropical Deciduous Forests in Mondulkiri Province, Cambodia KHUN Vathana Former REDD Focal Point, FA
15:40-16:00 Application of Two Phase Sampling Method for Forest Biomass Estimation Dr. SAH Bhuwneshwar & HAVIA Jussi PASCO Corporation
16:00-16:30 Coffee Break
Session 5 Managing Forests for Human Dimension Dr. YOSHIMOTO Atsushi, Chairman Professor, the Institute of Statistical Mathematics (ISM)
16:30-16:50 The Status of Forestry Education & Research in Managing the Existing Forests in Cambodia’s Protected Areas.” Dr. PATTNAIK Anita Pannasastra University of Cambodia
16:50-17:10 Ecological Forest Management Planning for Japanese Bush Warbler (Cettia diphone cantans) and White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) in Jeju island, South Korea SEOL Ara Seoul National University
18:30-20:30 Supper Discussions
Closing day 1

10 August 2010

Time Title Name Affiliation
Session 6 REDD+ and Forest Ecosystems

NAKATA Hiroshi, Chairman Adviser to FA’s Director General, JICA
8:30-8:50 Development of the Seima Protection Forest REDD Project Dr.  EVANS Tom Deputy Director,  WCS Cambodia
8:50-9:10 Managing Concession Forests in Cambodia under the REDD+ Mechanism Dr. SASAKI Nophea, H.E. TY Sokhun Associate Professor,
University of Hyogo
9:10-9:30 Ensuring Scientific Credibility in a Community Based REDD Project, Oddar Meanchey Cambodia CARR Hollie, PACT Cancelled
9:30-9:50 Coffee Break
Session 7 Management Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Services, Part 1 SEAK Sophat, Chairman DES Lecturer, RUPP
9:50-10:10 Three Types of Forest Management in Cambodia as an Opportunity to Optimize Different Goals towards Sustainable Society Dr. YAHARA Tetsukazu Professor

Kyushu University

10:10-10:30 Precision Management of Selection Forests Using Innovative Surveying Technologies in Hokkaido, Japan Dr. OWARI Toshiaki Lecturer, University of Tokyo
10:30-10:50 Coffee Break
Session 8 Management Schemes for Forest Ecosystem Services, Part 2 Dr. SASAKI Nophea, Chairman Associate Professor, University of Hyogo
10:50-11:10 Spatial Management for Invasive Species Dr. KONOSHIMA Masashi Associate Professor, Ryukyu University
11:10-11:30 Spatial Consideration for Forest Resource Management within the Optimization Framework Dr. YOSHIMOTO Atsushi Professor, ISM
11:30-11:50 Risk Estimate by Logistic Regression Analysis and Model Selection Procedure KAMO Keninchi Lecturer, Sapporo Medical University
11:50-12:00 Closing Speech Dr. YOSHIMOTO Atsushi Professor, ISM
12:00-13:30 Lunch and Closing

Cambodia’s National Forest Programme Online

In 1997 the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) initiated the process of developing a National Forest Programme (NFP) by establishing a national committee on forest policy reform with support from FAO, UNDP and WB (FAO 2002). In 2002, the secretariat of the committee in collaboration with the GTZ-funded Cambodian-German forestry project formulated a national forest policy statement (RGC 2002). Subsequently, a new Forest Law was promulgated in 2002, a Forestry Administration was established in 2003, and a Sub Decree on Community Forestry
adopted in 2005.

In November 2004, the RGC established a Technical Working Group on Forestry and Environment (TWG-F & E) to provide a mechanism for government-donor coordination to support and strengthen development activities within the forestry and environment sectors (Details are available at www.twgfe.org).

Since September 2006 the Forest and Landscape, University of Copenhagen has supported the Forestry Administration in initiating the current NFP process including LFA workshops on planning (September 2006) and support in conducting two preparatory NFP workshops, one internal in FA (January 2007) and one with multiple stakeholders (March 2007). In spite of earlier initiatives outlined above, the development of a coherent National Forest Programme has yet to be completed in Cambodia. The preparation of the NFP will follow a participatory planning approach that encourages the involvement of all forest-dependent actors at village, commune, district, provincial, national and international levels. Throughout the preparatory process, a National Forest Programme Task Force was established. In October 2007, the Task Force conducted its first meeting to agree on the Annual Action Plan 2007-2008.

The purpose of the NFP is to promote the conservation and sustainable management and use of forest resources in Cambodia. The NFP will aim to meet local, national and global needs by coordinating national and international partnerships to manage, use, protect and regenerate forest resources for the benefit of present and future generations of Cambodians. The preparation of a NFP in Cambodia, whilst adopting a consultative approach, will emphasize national sovereignty with regard to the management of the country’s forest resources, and the need for country leadership and responsibility.

The NFP, as a framework for planning, will provide strategic orientation for the forestry sector in harmony with other sectors of the national economy. As a framework for action and investment, the NFP will also facilitate concerted and coordinated implementation of programmes and activities by all stakeholders based on mutually agreed objectives and strategies.

Click here to download Nationa Forest Programme in Cambodia

Manual for Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects

Forest Trends, CCBA, FFI, and Rainforest Alliance have published Version 1.0 of a “Manual for Social Impact Assessment of Land-Based Carbon Projects.” The Manual is designed to be used by carbon project proponents aiming for validation under the CCB Standards, or other multiple-benefit carbon standards. The NGOs involved in this initiative believe that a combination of credible social impact assessment methods and robust standards for verifying the co-benefits provides an important way of promoting positive social outcomes of land-based carbon projects. The Manual is Version 1.0, since the idea is to ‘field test’ it over the coming months and, based on user experience, peer review, and other feedback, bring out Version 2.0 in early 2011.

Download full manual here!

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Substituting the Use of Woody Biomass from Thinned Wood for Bioenergy Generation in Japan

(Paper under reviews: Etoh & Sasaki 2010)

Abstract

Under the Marrakesh Accord of the Kyoto Protocol, Japan is allowed to use forest carbon sinks as reduction option for meeting its greenhouse gas reduction commitment. Due to inactive management coupled with slow forest growth, intensive thinning is being implemented to accelerate the growth so that carbon sinks could reach the capped amount of 47.7 TgCO2 year-1. Beginning in 2007, special budgets were allocated for a 6-year intensive thinning on about 3.3 million ha of young stands. However, because a large proportion of thinned wood and wood waste are not utilized, we argue that thinning alone is not a viable option for reducing carbon emissions as unused thinned wood and wood waste gradually emit methane. We assessed carbon emission reduction potentials when woody biomass from thinned wood is fully utilized for bioenergy generation as compared with the generation of the same amount of energy produced under coal, oil, and natural gas scenarios. Our analytical results show that if all thinned wood and wood waste are utilized to generate energy, about 78.7, 74.9, and 56.12 TgCO2 year-1 could be prevented from emitting depending on emission scenarios or about 39.9, 37.9, and 27.9% of Japan’s reduction commitment to the Kyoto Protocol. On the other hand, if thinned wood and wood waste are not utilized, about 21.6 TgCO2 year-1 would be released due to thinning. Our results suggest that Japan should implement thinning to increase carbon sinks in the forests only if appropriate policies to promote the utilization of woody biomass from such thinning are introduced.

Book: A Nested Approach to REDD+

This book is written by The Nature Conservancy and Baker & McKenzie and here is the summary. Follow the link below to download the book.

• In order for REDD+ to be successful, incentives will need to reach the actors responsible for addressing the drivers of deforestation and for shifting land use to a more sustainable and low-carbon model. These actors span multiple scales, from international commodity buyers to national governments to sub-national governments to indigenous peoples and forest-dependent communities to individual landowners/users.

• Devising effective and transparent carbon accounting systems and incentive mechanisms that motivate both national and sub-national actors will be critical to successfully implementing REDD+.

• A nested approach to REDD+ is one way to structure such a system. Under a nested approach the national government could set up a national accounting framework and establish a nation-wide monitoring system. The national government could implement certain policy reforms that would lead to verifiable emission reductions and therefore earn incentives from an international system (or a bilateral arrangement). Meanwhile, implementation of REDD+ activities could also occur at the sub-national level led by local/regional governments, communities, NGOs, or private developers. These activities would account for emission reductions at the sub-national level and earn incentives directly from the international (or bilateral) system based on those reductions. Under the approach proposed in this paper, the sub-national accounting would need to be “trued-up” to the national level (i.e. all credits issued in any given year are based on the performance of the nation as a whole relative to its reference emission level).

• A nested approach to REDD+ has the potential to address many of the drawbacks of pure national or pure sub-national approaches by accounting for in-country leakage, engaging national governments, and taking advantage of certain economies of scale, while also motivating sub-national actors to participate in REDD+ and attracting greater private investment. A nested approach may also provide for a more transparent distribution of the benefits from REDD+ since local actors could own and transact credits directly rather than relying on a national system of benefit-sharing. However, a nested approach will likely require more complex carbon accounting methodologies, clearly defined systems for sharing risk between actors, and defined institutional arrangements for managing the flow of incentives.

• Nested carbon accounting should include the following elements: a clear national reference emission level, defined sub-national reference regions (non-overlapping areas that cover the entire land mass of the country designated based on common drivers of deforestation and political jurisdictions), and, in some cases, nested projects whose reference emission levels add up to the reference region and hence the national reference emission level.

• Under the nested approach we propose in this paper, there is a risk that sub-national actors may not receive compensation for successful activities in the event that the country as a whole fails to perform. This risk will need to be minimized in order to promote sub-national participation and private investment. This paper outlines several options for risk management among actors, including insurance products, a global self-insurance fund, performance reserve accounts, or contracts between parties for replacement of REDD+ credits.

• These options could be combined to meet the needs of particular country circumstances. The set of options chosen could lead to a greater assumption of risk by the national government, an even distribution of risk between actors, or a greater assumption of risk by sub-national actors. Several plausible arrangements exist, and the set of options chosen will greatly influence the level of sub-national involvement and private investment.

• Given the potential advantages of a nested approach to REDD+, an international agreement on REDD+ and domestic legislation in the U.S. and other developed countries should allow developing countries the option to pursue a nested approach to REDD+ backed by adequate risk management strategies. Developing country governments should consider a nested approach to REDD+ when devising their national REDD+ strategies.

Download it here

Cambodia’s Jungle Woman returns to Jungle

Rochom P’ngieng, now 29 years old, first disappeared into thick hilly jungle in 1989 when she was a little girl. She was “discovered” in early 2007 and reunited with her family.

However, attempts to reintegrate her have failed. She has not learnt either of the local languages, Khmer or Phnang, prefers to crawl rather than walk, refuses to wear clothes and has made several attempts to return to the forest where she grew up. Her father, Sal Lou, a policeman, said that she had been making progress recently, but disappeared on Tuesday evening (25 May 2010).

Read more at http://www.telegraph.co.uk

How to restore tropical degraded forests

Abstract (Sasaki et al.: paper under reviews)

Recognition of improved forest management as a way to enhance carbon sinks in the Copenhagen Accord of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (December 2009) suggests that forest restoration could play a role in global climate change mitigation under the post-Kyoto agreement. Although discussions on restoration strategies often refer to severely degraded tropical forests, even moderate degradation contributes substantially to carbon emissions. Recognition of the wide range of different types and degrees of degradation is a prerequisite to developing appropriate strategies for countering its impacts. We propose approaches for classifying and restoring degraded forests that starts by slowing the causes of degradation and letting forests regenerate on their own, progresses through managing natural regeneration in degraded areas actively to accelerate tree regeneration and growth, and finally reaches the stage of degradation where re-planting is necessary. We argue that forest restoration is often cost-effective and can sequester substantial amounts of carbon if international incentives supported by national policies, institutional arrangements, and local participation are fostered by post-Kyoto agreements.

Book: Global Biodiversity Outlook 3

This Outlook presents some stark choices for human societies. On one hand it warns that the diversity of living things on the planet continues to be eroded as a result of human activities. The pressures driving the loss of biodiversity show few signs of easing, and in some cases are escalating. The consequences of current trends are much worse than previously thought, and place in doubt the continued provision of vital ecosystem services. The poor stand to suffer disproportionately from potentially catastrophic changes to ecosystems in coming decades, but ultimately all societies stand to lose.

On the other hand, the Outlook offers a message of hope. The options for addressing the crisis are wider than was apparent in earlier studies. Determined action to conserve biodiversity and use it sustainably will reap rich rewards.
It will benefit people in many ways – through better health, greater food security and less poverty. It will safeguard the variety of nature, an objective justified in its own right according to a range of belief systems and moral codes.
It will help to slow climate change by enabling ecosystems to absorb and store more carbon; and it will help people adapt to climate change by adding resilience to ecosystems and making them less vulnerable. Taking actions to ensure the maintenance and restoration of well-functioning ecosystems, underpinned by biodiversity and providing natural infrastructure for human societies, can provide economic gains worth trillions of dollars a year.
The latest science suggests ever more strongly that better management, conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity is a prudent and cost-effective investment in social and economic security, and in risk reduction for the global community. This Outlook shows that efforts to date have not been sufficient to reduce significantly the rate of
biodiversity loss and analyses why; it assesses the potential for long-lasting or irreversible ecosystem changes to result from current trends and practices; and it concludes that concerted and targeted responses, with action applied at appropriate levels to address both direct pressures on biodiversity and their underlying causes, can in the long term stop or even reverse the continued decline in the variety of life on Earth. The action taken over the next two decades will determine whether the relatively stable environmental conditions on which human civilization has depended for the past 10,000 years will continue beyond this century. If we fail to use this opportunity, many ecosystems on the planet will move into new, unprecedented states in which the capacity to provide for the needs of present and future generations is highly uncertain.

Download full book here

Book: Bringing forest carbon projects to the market

The Guidebook presents the components of the forest carbon project cycle from an economics and finance perspective because these late stage considerations are often the most complicated part of bringing forestry projects to successful
project completion. Specifically, it will instruct developers and investors on how to finance forest carbon projects and sell credits, including the factors to consider when registering a forestry project in the CDM or voluntary carbon market (VCM), instruct developers on how to manage forestry-specific risks, and provide an overview of the most recent state and the trends of the forestry carbon market. Each component of the Guidebook will be illustrated via 4-5 real-life Case Studies.

The Guidebook is available in English and Spanish, as well as French, and is being widely distributed internationally to stimulate replication of projects and to help develop the forest carbon sector. The carbon classes included are commercial and community afforestation and reforestation (AR), reducing emissions resulting from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD), and improved forest management (IFM).

This guide was produced thanks to support from the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Department of Technology, Industry and Economics (DTIE) and UNEP Risoe Centre, the French Development Agency (AFD), the World Bank BioCarbon Fund and ONF International. The document was revised by a panel of experts from different backgrounds.

Download this book here

$4 billion pledged for protecting tropical forests

Rich countries pledge $4B to stop deforestation

By IAN MacDOUGALL Associated Press Writer
Published: Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:09 a.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, May 27, 2010 at 11:09 a.m.

OSLO, Norway – Developed nations pledged more than $4 billion Thursday to finance a program meant to help poor countries protect their forests and slow global warming.

An agency monitoring the aid will be up and running before U.N. climate talks start in Cancun, Mexico, later this year, the European Union’s climate commissioner said at a conference on deforestation in Oslo.

Also, Indonesia agreed to a two-year moratorium on issuing new permits for forest destruction as part of a $1 billion deal with Norway that would pay Indonesia a fixed sum per ton of CO2 emissions reduced through rain forest preservation. Norway has had a similar deal with Brazil since the mid-1990s.

Deforestation, the burning of woodlands or the rotting of felled trees, is thought to account for up to 20 percent of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere – as much as is emitted by all the world’s cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships combined.

The new program – called REDD Plus, for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation – will encourage rich nations to voluntarily finance forest-protecting projects while coordinating that aid to avoid waste and ensure transparency.

It was approved – but not implemented – at the U.N. climate talks in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December.

In Oslo, Germany, France, Norway, the U.S., Britain, Australia and Japan pledged $4 billion to finance REDD Plus through 2012, with Denmark and Sweden adding $73 million more to the effort on Thursday.

An agency monitoring the aid will be up and running before U.N. climate talks start in Cancun, Mexico, later this year, the European Union’s climate commissioner said at a conference on deforestation in Oslo.

Also, Indonesia agreed to a two-year moratorium on issuing new permits for forest destruction as part of a $1 billion deal with Norway that would pay Indonesia a fixed sum per ton of CO2 emissions reduced through rain forest preservation. Norway has had a similar deal with Brazil since the mid-1990s.

Deforestation, the burning of woodlands or the rotting of felled trees, is thought to account for up to 20 percent of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere – as much as is emitted by all the world’s cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships combined.

The new program – called REDD Plus, for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation – will encourage rich nations to voluntarily finance forest-protecting projects while coordinating that aid to avoid waste and ensure transparency.

It was approved – but not implemented – at the U.N. climate talks in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December.

In Oslo, Germany, France, Norway, the U.S., Britain, Australia and Japan pledged $4 billion to finance REDD Plus through 2012, with Denmark and Sweden adding $73 million more to the effort on Thursday.

The nee monitoring agency would oversee individual agreements between countries to fight deforestation and educate local populations who live off forests – estimated at more than 1 billion worldwide – to do so in a sustainable way.

EU climate commissioner Connie Hedegaard said the new agency, and a comprehensive database that will help streamline aid combating deforestation, were tangible results that would build momentum in climate talks ahead of the Cancun summit.

Indonesia’s President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said the new agency would “decrease a trust deficit” that has stymied progress in wider climate talks, as wealthy countries express concern about how aid money is used in poor nations.

“Forests are worth more dead than alive. Today we commit to change that equation,” said Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, who was co-chairing the conference with the Indonesia president.

A political agreement at the U.N. climate summit in Copenhagen last year called for warming to be kept from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels by 2020 – which scientists say could trigger a climate catastrophe. But the Copenhagen conference disappointed many in failing to produce a legally binding deal for countries to limit emissions.

Thursday’s meeting was the last on REDD Plus planned before Cancun, with work now starting on establishing the agency’s infrastructure.

Britain’s Prince Charles agreed that transparency was key in brokering a binding global climate agreement.

“In this period of increased stringency, governments will need to know that every dollar made available will be spent wisely in order to avoid any unnecessary duplication,” he said in a speech.

An agency monitoring the aid will be up and running before U.N. climate talks start in Cancun, Mexico, later this year, the European Union’s climate commissioner said at a conference on deforestation in Oslo.

Also, Indonesia agreed to a two-year moratorium on issuing new permits for forest destruction as part of a $1 billion deal with Norway that would pay Indonesia a fixed sum per ton of CO2 emissions reduced through rain forest preservation. Norway has had a similar deal with Brazil since the mid-1990s.

Deforestation, the burning of woodlands or the rotting of felled trees, is thought to account for up to 20 percent of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere – as much as is emitted by all the world’s cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships combined.

The new program – called REDD Plus, for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation – will encourage rich nations to voluntarily finance forest-protecting projects while coordinating that aid to avoid waste and ensure transparency.

It was approved – but not implemented – at the U.N. climate talks in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December.

In Oslo, Germany, France, Norway, the U.S., Britain, Australia and Japan pledged $4 billion to finance REDD Plus through 2012, with Denmark and Sweden adding $73 million more to the effort on Thursday.

The new monitoring agency would oversee individual agreements between countries to fight deforestation and educate local populations who live off forests – estimated at more than 1 billion worldwide – to do so in a sustainable way.

EU climate commissioner Connie Hedegaard said the new agency, and a comprehensive database that will help streamline aid combating deforestation, were tangible results that would build momentum in climate talks ahead of the Cancun summit.

Indonesia’s President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said the new agency would “decrease a trust deficit” that has stymied progress in wider climate talks, as wealthy countries express concern about how aid money is used in poor nations.

“Forests are worth more dead than alive. Today we commit to change that equation,” said Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg, who was co-chairing the conference with the Indonesia president.

A political agreement at the U.N. climate summit in Copenhagen last year called for warming to be kept from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels by 2020 – which scientists say could trigger a climate catastrophe. But the Copenhagen conference disappointed many in failing to produce a legally binding deal for countries to limit emissions.

Thursday’s meeting was the last on REDD Plus planned before Cancun, with work now starting on establishing the agency’s infrastructure.

Britain’s Prince Charles agreed that transparency was key in brokering a binding global climate agreement.

“In this period of increased stringency, governments will need to know that every dollar made available will be spent wisely in order to avoid any unnecessary duplication,” he said in a speech.

While the $4 billion is only two-thirds of the $6 billion Brazilian Environment Minister Carlos Minc said he hoped would be in place by the Oslo conference, environmentalists said it was a good start for the fledgling program.

“For early phases, the kind of money we’re talking about is probably sufficient,” said Mark Tercek, the head of U.S. conservation group the Nature Conservancy.

Greenpeace welcomed the pledges of financing but warned that it remains unclear how the funds will be spent.

The funding so far comes exclusively from government budgets, and Stoltenberg called for “voluntary contributions” from private sector and industry players. He also said that ultimately “the most important source of money will be carbon pricing” – from carbon trading and carbon taxation schemes.

About 32 million acres (13 million hectares) of forests are cut down each year – an area about the size of England or New York state – and the emissions generated are comparable to those of China and the United States, according to the independent U.K. Eliasch Review on forest loss.


Associated Press writers Malin Rising in Stockholm and Jan Olsen in Copenhagen, Denmark, contributed to this report.